Survey: Physician Attitudes Shift To Single Payer Chicago Medical Society, June 13, 2017 Nearly four in five Chicago area physicians are opposed to the American Health Care Act (AHCA) under consideration by the U.S. Senate as increasing numbers of physicians support a single-payer “Medicare-for-All” form of health insurance. A survey of more than 1,000 physicians…
Earlier this year, as the Russia scandal heated up, a number of commentators bemoaned Washington’s “obsession” with the story. The Independent’s Andrew Buncombe, noting that “there remains no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to influence the election,” wrote that “the Siberian Candidate theory is so dangerous is that it is a distraction from…
As we’ve seen, being a multimillionaire can lead to certain, shall we say, impulse control problems. Greg Gianforte, Montana congressional candidates and all-around Republican jerk who donated to a white supremacist candidate, was charged with misdemeanor assault after attacking a reporter last night. Sheriff Brian Gootkin released this statement: “Following multiple interviews and an investigation…
Most Americans were shocked and disturbed when Raúl R. Labrador, a Republican Congressman, said, “Nobody dies because they don’t have access to health care.” Most people would like to think that such a comment would be an anomaly, but then we remember that Todd Akin, who tried to convince us that there was such a thing as “Legitimate Rape,” was also a GOP Congressman. Maybe extreme thoughts and ideas are not outliers in the Republican party. Perhaps harsh and cruel are at the core of the GOP agenda for America. The party has certainly given America plenty of reasons to think that is the case.
Now, the Senate Republicans are working on healthcare. When what they might do is taken with what House Republicans have already approved and what 45 is proposing in his budget, America’s vulnerable populations (women, children, seniors, working class and poor) are in trouble if the GOP gets its way.
Americans who desire a just and fair healthcare policy will get a chance to vote for leaders who support such a policy in 2018 and 2020. Now, the only recourse is to contact members of Congress and ask them to #ProtectOurCare!
The Anniston Star reported yesterday that Alabama Congressman Mike Rogers has heard no complaints about his affirmative vote for the American Health Care Act. The article is behind a pay wall, but the headline begs for explanation from Congressman Rogers. We know that he has receive complaints because we have called to complain. Either he is not getting the messages from the folks who answer his phones or he is just not listening, maybe it is a little of both.
What is clear from his inattention to his 03 district voters and his voting record is that he is not a reliable advocate for healthcare needs of the people living in his district. If he has not heard yet, then we need to call more.
Congressman Rogers needs to now that we oppose the passage of the American Health Care Act for many reasons, not the least of which are:
- Preexisting Conditions. We have them and the AHCA will make it possible for insurance companies to refuse to cover people with preexisting conditions.
- AHCA weakens Medicare by reducing it’s solvency to 2025 from 2028
- The Affordable Care Act has the Medicare Part D “donut hole” on schedule to close in 2020. Repealing the Affordable Care Act could force Medicare participants to cover much of the prescription medication needs out of their own pockets.
- The AHCA is bad for women in ways to numerous to name in this post. The Kaiser Family Foundation does an excellent job of spelling out the problem in Ten Ways That the House American Health Care Act Could Affect Women
Congressman Rogers can be reached at the following numbers:
Phone: (202) 225-3261
Fax: (202) 226-8485
Phone: (256) 236-5655
Fax: (256) 237-9203
Phone: (334) 745-6221
Fax: (334) 742-0109
Call him and make your voice heard. However, don’t be surprised if he acts like you never called. Many people in his district have been trying to get him to listen for a while now. He just seems to ignore them. Here are some examples of letters to the Anniston Star, one newspaper in his district
On Monday, I telephoned Rep. Mike Rogers’ office to find out when he planned to have a town-hall meeting or time for meeting face-to-face with constituents during next week’s recess. I was told he would be doing “committee work” and will be unavailable to meet with anyone next week.
On Tuesday, I heard Rep. Greg Walden, R-Oregon, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, announce that he had held five town-hall meetings in the last two weeks. He wanted his constituents’ input on the very important legislative actions that are coming up soon.
If Walden can make time for his constituents, why can’t Rogers? The 3rd congressional district elected him to represent us (and to get paid by our tax dollars for doing so). Isn’t it important to meet with us and listen to our wishes and concerns? I urge Rogers to change his plans and make time for the people he represents.
February 15, 2017
Re “Residents hold town hall, minus Congressman Rogers” (News article, March 8):
As a follow-up to our group’s Rep. Mike Rogers Town Hall in Absentia last week in Anniston, I wanted to add that U.S. congressmen are scheduled for numerous recess periods throughout the year for the purpose of returning them to their districts to meet with constituents. Rogers has already spent an eight-day recess period in February on other committee travel. Congress is scheduled for another two-week recess in April for district work and meeting with constituents.
We have no idea if Rogers plans to meet with large numbers of constituents during that time. His office will only say that he will plan town halls later in the year. What does that mean?
I contacted Rogers’ office last fall during a similar recess period and was told then that he was on committee travel. Perhaps Rogers is involved on too many committees. If he spends the bulk of his recess time throughout the year on committee travel, then how is he to know what his constituents are concerned about? Remember, he is our representative. He should be accountable to us.
March 12, 2017
I am 80 years old. I have to use a walker. Due to an operation, I cannot speak. I don’t go out at night. But I would go to a town-hall meeting of Congressman Mike Rogers, representative of the 3rd congressional district of Alabama, if he would have one.
April 14, 2017
In March, frustrated voters finally decided to have a town hall meeting whether Rogers showed up or not. Residents hold town hall, minus Congressman Rogers No, he did not attend.
The people of the Alabama 3rd Congressional District are persistent. In April, they were back in the streets raising awareness of Congressman Rogers lack of availability. Protesters in Anniston say they want town hall with Mike Rogers
To our knowledge, the citizens of East Alabama are still waiting on Congressman Rogers to host a town hall meeting. However, Congressman Rogers has managed to meet with donors and potential donors. Case in point, Thank you to the Montgomery Chamber for having me this morning for Eggs and Issues!
What is clear is that Congressman Rogers either does not care about what people in his district think about the American Health Care Act or he just does not care.
The problem is that he will likely never suffer the impact of the bad policies and laws that he votes to approve. We, the people of Alabama will. We have to call. We have to #ProtectOurCare.
Democracy for America is enlisting volunteers to call Montana voters and encourage them to vote for a candidate who will #ProtectOurCare, Rob Quist!
Voters in Montana are fired up and ready to throw Republicans out of office. And they love Rob Quist.
Check out the great reports we’ve gotten back this week from DFA members who have been making calls for Rob on DFA Dialer:
“I do have to say my experience today with Montana voters was delightful and I look forward to making more calls. People want to engage in conversation and talk about the issues. Listening to people’s concerns helped me to learn more about why Rob Quist is so right for this state.”
“I’ve been making these calls since at least the Gore/Bush election, and I have to tell you, talking to people in Montana is different. I’ve never had so much fun!”
Rob is a true progressive populist — he supports Medicare for All, he’s pro-choice, and he opposes Citizens United. And he is running an incredible campaign right now. He has been holding listening sessions and rallies in counties all over Montana, and his message is clearly resonating.
Rob’s opponent is one of the Republicans’ weakest recruits — a New Jersey tech billionaire and perennial failed candidate who lost in November to a Democratic governor even as Trump won the state. So we know that this race is winnable.
DFA members are having a real impact this special election: Together, we made more than 13,000 calls for Rob Quist on DFA Dialer last weekend alone. Can you hop on DFA Dialer this weekend to help set the stage for a big win in Montana?
Republicans are getting EXTREMELY nervous this race. Late last week, the Congressional Leadership Fund — a super PAC aligned with House Speaker Paul Ryan — announced a massive $800,000 ad buy to defeat Quist. And that’s on top of the $1.2 million the National Republican Congressional Committee plans to spend in Montana between now and Election Day.
It’s no surprise that deep-pocketed GOP donors are trying to get ahead of the curve on this race, after being taken by surprise by the incredible wave of Democratic grassroots momentum in Kansas and Georgia. They’re not waiting until the last minute — they want to overwhelm Quist’s campaign with a flood of cash and false tv ads now.
But there’s one thing they’re not counting on: The energy, excitement and passion of DFA members who are fighting every day to replace Trump’s Republican allies with bold progressive populists. Can you sign up for a DFA Dialer shift this weekend to help Rob Quist win?
A new healthcare reform plan would allow states to eliminate protections for individuals who have pre-existing health conditions.